> On Dec 15, 2021, at 5:31 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Dec 15, 2021, at 18:56, Wessels, Duane 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> For me “necessary” is an important distinction and “might be useful” is too 
>> broad or ambiguous.  I have a hard time reconciling the idea that glue is 
>> not optional with the idea that it might be useful
> 
> Necessary for resolving, securely resolving and/or resolving with privacy ?
> 
> In other words, would a TLSA or SVCB be “necessary” or not ?
> 
> Paul

Well, that is why I feel that we’re heading in a direction where the IETF will 
have to say which RR types must be considered as glue (aka necessary).  Today 
it's just A and AAAA, but if some of the proposals in DPRIVE achieve consensus 
then maybe those other types become designated as glue.

DW


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to