On Aug 2, 2022, at 10:26, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> On 02.08.22 09:56, Joe Abley wrote: >> >> If the position of the ISE is to ignore the prior discussion and publish one >> set of opinions regardless then perhaps it would be more straightforward >> just to say so. > > Had I wanted to do so, I would not have approached dnsop in the first place. Had you wanted to which? I'm confused. By approaching dnsop in the first place with a box of freshly lit matches you seem precisely to be ignoring the prior discussion. If you don't intend to publish the drafts on your table then I don't understand what you're saying in the context of the hat you're wearing. Perhaps more fundamentally the idea of the ISE promoting work to be done in a working group apparently without the involvement of the chairs itself seems confusing. You know more about the job than I do, but in the past when I have published documents through the independent stream, the ISE's consultation was limited to an IESG conflict review. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
