On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 5:13 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems like a poor economy. If you really are worried about making the > bitmap smaller, I suppose there's unused type 54.
Without advocating for that, I wanted to explore this a bit. Does anyone know why it is unassigned? Is there any history behind that? And would current meta type allocation rules even allow it to be used for this purpose? (OPT is meta and uses type 41, but that probably predates the DNS IANA considerations doc by ages.) Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
