On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 1:46 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: ...
> COMMENTS > > Slight regret that some of my -08 comments were not addressed (e.g., > expanding > HSTS) even if most of them were indeed addressed. > I'm sorry if we missed some comments at an earlier stage. At this point, we are operating under instructions to make the minimal changes necessary to break this normative dependency. I also wonder about the amount of ECH-related content in this revised I-D > while > the whole goal of the exercise was to disconnect from ECH. E.g., in > section 1.1 > there is a *new* " Enable the conveyance of Encrypted ClientHello [ECH] > keys > associated with an alternative endpoint." > This text isn't really "new". It replaces the line "Obtain the Encrypted ClientHello [ECH] keys associated with an alternative endpoint" in draft-11, and appears as "new" in the diff because it has been moved to the end of the list. > BTW, I like the addition of DNS64 in the document. > > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
