Ben, I am afraid that I forgot to ack your email with an agreement on all your points 😊
Regards -éric From: Benjamin Schwartz <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 18 April 2023 at 13:20 To: Eric Vyncke <[email protected]> Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12: (with COMMENT) On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 1:46 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: ... COMMENTS Slight regret that some of my -08 comments were not addressed (e.g., expanding HSTS) even if most of them were indeed addressed. I'm sorry if we missed some comments at an earlier stage. At this point, we are operating under instructions to make the minimal changes necessary to break this normative dependency. I also wonder about the amount of ECH-related content in this revised I-D while the whole goal of the exercise was to disconnect from ECH. E.g., in section 1.1 there is a *new* " Enable the conveyance of Encrypted ClientHello [ECH] keys associated with an alternative endpoint." This text isn't really "new". It replaces the line "Obtain the Encrypted ClientHello [ECH] keys associated with an alternative endpoint" in draft-11, and appears as "new" in the diff because it has been moved to the end of the list. BTW, I like the addition of DNS64 in the document.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
