Paul, Here is some specific proposed text to address the concern that I raised:
Whereas the priming response is not a referral, and whereas root server addresses in the priming response are therefore not considered glue records, RFC 9471 does not apply to the priming response. Root servers are not required to set the TC bit in a priming response if not all root server addresses fit within message size constraints. There are no requirements on the number of root server addresses that a root server must include in a priming response. DW > On Feb 6, 2024, at 1:39 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > I have submitted -03, which covers the issues you raised in your AD review. > Note that Duane and Mark had more to say on the topic of TC from the roots, > but there was no agreement nor specific text proposed. > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1U98vDfdUh-VITwB6fwCdeqAzIC9TAvh0PR_dhvmt312mdwsd3QwvIEi-5zkK2xu5FUXbFHbmHJcNnRuHmVo-Jx9ivcmH95-tpEO5qRBER-_VrCnmKhOgfexsfCYyO_ZNUJQFVBawYfduf9BON3TGTLvMpU0Sd5rZ3VrOwCT36kCNdYxsZlsoo1N0zj3wxa6taF1TiJRt2miLLyya4F70bPtuGI4WU5INGMxnDlLyMgKX0cjpJMtvwupkhZD-UTik4mNpuD08puUESib8l0rMhwAnUCz9FfA-rz4dNa-Deqc/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdnsop >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
