On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 12:59 AM Peter Thomassen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Erik, > > Thanks for your review! > > On 5/5/24 00:18, Erik Kline via Datatracker wrote: > > ## Comments > > > > ### S7 > > > > * Should there be some kind of registration or reservation for the > "_dsboot" > > meaning and usage described in this document? > The authors were wondering as well. > > We figured that unlike in case of the existing underscore registry, the > issue seems less pressing: > > The _dsboot etc. labels are under the "main" underscore label right in > front of the nameserver name. As a result, the signaling type label (like > _dsboot) is somewhat "shielded", in the sense that they are only used under > the signaling mechanism, i.e., by DNS operators announcing stuff about > their managed zones. Given the limited target group for the signaling > mechanism overall, collisions seem less likely than with underscore labels > in general. > > The authors are also not sure under which conditions such registries > should or should not be erected. In short, we don't really have an answer > to your question, except that less may be more, but it's not clear. > > That said, the authors think "why not", and if you wish, we can add a > section to address this. I imagine this would be something like RFC 8552 > Section 4.1 [1]. This would add ~2 pages to the draft, unless there's a > shorter way to do it. > > [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8552#section-4.1 > > Thanks, > Peter and Nils > Thanks for your reply. I have no particular intuition telling me what's best here. I'm happy to wait and see what other reviews think.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
