> On 5 Feb 2025, at 3:23 am, Peter Thomassen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2/5/25 08:10, Joe Abley wrote: >>> The substantial changes in the -01 are a mistake and should be removed. >> I agree with that, and with all of the subsequent trimmed detail. > > +1 > > As for Geoff's point that "a duly qualified body who can make such name > allocations has indeed done so", I don't think that makes it a special *use* > (!) domain. >
-1 Thats not what I said. I was making the point that its not only the IETF who can initiate steps to place an entery in this registry.. If you disagree with that proposition I'd be interested to hear your rationale for such a position, The draft provides a set of considerations as per the considerations in RFC6761. If you find some disagree with the draft's recitation of these considerations then I guess that this is the entire purpose of discussing this draft on the dnsop list.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
