On 2/5/25 12:26, Geoff Huston wrote:
As for Geoff's point that "a duly qualified body who can make such name allocations
has indeed done so", I don't think that makes it a special *use* (!) domain.
-1
Thats not what I said. I was making the point that its not only the IETF who
can initiate steps to place an entery in this registry.. If you disagree with
that proposition I'd be interested to hear your rationale for such a position,
I did not mean to comment on that; I was rather attempting to make the same point that
Joe made a bit later, apparently more clearly (the registry is about "how a domain
name should be used, not its provenance").
There's no special handling of .internal that I think would justify adding it
to the registry; users having to be aware of it meaning different things in
different networks is in my mind not special handling by the protocol. (... and
also applies to any other split-horizon setup.)
If you find some disagree with the draft's recitation of these considerations
then I guess that this is the entire purpose of discussing this draft on the
dnsop list.
And that we is what we're doing. :-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
https://desec.io/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
