No that is a malformed unknown record.

MX \\# 18 000a02…O7…03…00

as I’m on my phone I’ll leave you to do the hex encoding of the domain name.  
-- 
Mark Andrews

> On 23 Oct 2025, at 18:41, Miek Gieben <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> [ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [DNSOP] subtyping for fun and p..." ]
>>> For RRs we fixed this by allowing unknown RRs, which have a presentation 
>>> format and a
>>> wireformat, so all is good. But we never did that for unknown rdata fields.
>> 
>> Actually we have.  UNKNOWN format handles records where the presentation 
>> format is subtype
>> dependent and you don’t know what that format is.  If you can’t display the 
>> record with a
>> subtype specific format you just display it in UNKNOWN format.  BIND has 
>> been doing this
>> since UNKNOWN format was proposed.  ATMA, APL, ATMRELAY, IPSECKEY, and LOC 
>> all fallback to
>> UNKNOWN format for unknown subtypes.
> 
> interesting, so BIND parses: `example.org. IN MX \\# 2 0A mx.example.org.` 
> just fine? My
> library certainly doesn't and 3597 didn't give me the impression this should 
> be allowed.
> 
> This is certainly something that might be worthwhile to document explicitly, 
> and figure
> out how this would play out with SVCB and friends.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to