I generally support this document, with two concerns:
Section 3.2 mentions "Broken IPv6 Connectivity at the Resolver". Why
does this paragraph has a focus on IPv6 while dismissing possible IPv4
issues?
With regard to section 4.1 "IPv6 adoption" - I would change the SHOULD
into a MUST in: "authoritative DNS servers SHOULD use native IPv6
addresses instead of IPv6 addresses synthesized"
--
Marco
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 06:11:09 -0800 Peter Thomassen via Datatracker wrote:
Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-07 (Ends 2025-12-04)
This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document.
Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
publication of this document
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
