On 14. 10. 25 22:34, Mark Andrews wrote:
Go look at the number of queries a DNS server makes to resolve one query it
gets. CNAME chains 5+ deep. Nameservers needing to be looked up at other
nameservers and maybe again. Zones served from servers in other TLDs (that
includes TLDs themselves). A single lookup of a 5 label name has gone from 5
queries to close to 100. With all of the anti practices we see today.
On 13. 10. 25 21:03, Philip Homburg wrote:
>>From the perspective of maintaining a validator I see it as binary:
> - going from accepting zero collisions to accepting one or more
collisions
> introduces complexity. Going from one to more than one has hardly
> any impact on complexity. So this is clearly binary. I don't really
> care about discussion whether we should accept one or two collisions.
In this thread I can see people with strong opinions, mostly separated
in two camps:
- Camp "N": No (recent?) implementation experience - but saying how
things surely must be done!
- Camp "1": Actively working on implementations - and also saying how
things should work.
Presented with this choice, I very much prefer to side with
implementers. I.e. I agree with what Philip and Mark said up thread.
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
