On 12/3/25 17:16, Philip Homburg wrote:
Avoiding them is certainly possible, but requires extra coordination.
It seems to me that the complexity of that is (much) larger than
continuing to allow ~one collision.
In my opinion this is a quality of implementation issue. We should
not design a multi-signer protocol that has collision even if there is
no document that requires it.
[...]
THere is also the issue that software that stores public keys in files
with the traditional filename scheme may have a hard time handling
key tag collisions.
I'll quote you:
In my opinion this is a quality of implementation issue.
;-)
Cheers,
Peter
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
