Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote: > "John R Levine" <[email protected]> writes:
>> That's the policy for country codes that don't exist any more, like
>> when .CS split into .CZ and .SK, or .TP turned into .TL. While I am
>> less certain than I used to be, I am fairly sure that .US still
>> exists.
> You're missing my point... If the process of making the RFC
> historic means the registration process / holdership for the
> current registrants will change, or worse be suddenly pulled out
I think you are missing John's point. .US hasn't been subject to RFC1480 in
some time. He mentions it moving from ISI/SRI-NIC in 1999, I think.
I think we should have marked 1480 historic then.
(I still have sandelman.ottawa.on.ca, which is also a geographic domain,
but .ca stopped accepting new ones 20 years ago. Annoys me. I regularly have
to convince registrars that it exists, even as they exchange emails with me
using it)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
