On Dec 19, 2025, at 16:03, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > It is clear the IETF doesn’t dictate policy for .us so marking the document > historic would send the proper signal for that.
When reading an RFC on the Datatracker, or in either of the supported HTML forms, you have to squint to see the status of the RFC, and you have to know to look for it. You're sending a "proper signal" to a small percentage of readers. > And would stop any further people from creating errata which, whether correct > or not, are distracting and useless work. It appears that you can submit errata on historic documents, so this is not a good reason to make something historic. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
