It appears that Paul Wouters <[email protected]> said: >I agree. It is clear the IETF doesn’t dictate policy for .us so marking the >document historic would send the proper signal for that. And would stop any >further people from
If we'd done that in 1999 it would have made sense. But we didn't, and now it is 25 years later. IF we change it now, people who see it will assume something has changed about the way .US works in the past 25 years, even though nothing has. The original message in this thread said it "does not reflect current practices for this domain" although in fact most of what it describes still works. You may not have known that we Locality Administrators still exist, but we do. >creating errata which, whether correct or not, are distracting and useless >work. In about 15 seconds, we could have said OK, hold for document update (which will never happen) and avoided this entire discussion. As Paul H noted, anyone can file errata on anything, so that's not much of an argument. I really do not understand why people are so determined to spend time on this. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
