On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:47:58 +0100 Peter Thomassen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Stefan, Hello Peter, > Thanks for your review! You're welcome. > On 1/19/26 10:41, Stefan Ubbink wrote: > > I've read the document and have some remarks. > > > > # 1. Introduction > > What is meant by 'the registry can effect parent-side changes to > > the delare reviewers not egation' ? Maybe my english is not > > sufficient, but I don't understand what is written there. > > I have to admit that my English is insufficient for that, too ;-) > > Somehow some superfluous characters had been pasted there. Fixed as > follows: > > OLD > registry can effect parent-side changes to the delare reviewers > not egation. In such a situation, additional questions arise. > > NEW > registry can effect parent-side changes to the delegation. In > such a situation, additional questions arise. That is a good fix and I can understand it :-) > > > # 5.2. Analysis > > In the sentence 'Registrars or (less commonly) registries can > > obtain the information from the registrant through another channel > > (such as a non-automated "manual update" via webform submission), > > and relay it to the registry.' for me it reads as the registry is > > notifying the registry. Maybe it can be rewritten to get rid of > > that, but keeping it as it is now is also acceptable to me. > > True. In fact, to my knowledge the registry does not have a DS > submission form in the RRR model. Thus, fixed as follows: > > OLD > * Registrars or (less commonly) registries can obtain the > information from the registrant through another channel (such > as a non-automated "manual update" via webform submission), and relay > it to the registry. > > NEW > * The registrar can obtain the information from the registrant > through another channel (such as a non-automated "manual > update" via webform submission), and relay it to the registry. Thank you for this new text. > > # 5.2.3. Concurrent Automatic Updates > > In the last paragraph of the section, 'RFC 6781' is no link in the > > html version. > > Fixed. > > I've also harmonized some terminology, and added a clarification that > manual DS provisioning is not necessarily subject to the same > acceptance checks as DS automation. (That's already clear as the > document does not relate to manual submissions, but it's good to > prevent confusion.) > > FWIW, folks can follow along the aggregate of WGLC changes here: > https://github.com/desec-io/draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-automation/compare/draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-automation-02...main I like the s/Parent operators/Parent-side entities/ . -- Stefan Ubbink DNS & Systems Engineer Present: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | ARNHEM | The Netherlands T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 https://www.sidn.nl
pgpZvlzUUVmqq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
