On 02. 07. 26 18:42, Roy Arends wrote:
Hi Petr,
On 1 Jul 2026, at 13:03, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote:
On 29. 06. 26 17:59, [email protected] wrote:
    Name:    draft-ietf-dnsop-delext-07.txt

Thanks for processing my mumbling above. I was not sure I'm on the right track, but if you say it sounds sensible I guess we are done with it and don't need to get _more_ WG input on these nits.

3.1.2. Private Use Range
The range 0xF1F0-0xF1FF is reserved for Private Use in accordance with 
[RFC8126]. Values in this range MUST NOT be published in zones intended for the 
public DNS and MUST NOT be used in any context where interoperability with 
implementations outside a private network is required.

I think we should remove sentence "Values in this range MUST NOT be published in zones 
intended for the public DNS" and keep only "MUST NOT be used in any context where 
interoperability with implementations outside a private network is required.". Otherwise we 
would need sub-range for experiments, and I think it is not necessary.

What does the group think?

I agree. This was too prescriptive on my side. Paul Hoffman also pointed that 
out recently. Happy to remove it.

Last, one nitpick I can't decide how to approach:

3. Delegation Types

[RFC6895] lists three subcategories of RR type numbers: data TYPEs, QTYPEs, and 
Meta-TYPEs. This specification adds a fourth subcategory: Delegation Types.

Section 9.3 requests IANA to allocate the ranges 0xF000-0xF1EF and 
0xF1F0-0xF1FF for Delegation Types.

Do people find it confusing that the original NS RR type is not labeled as 
'Delegation Type'?

I'm trying to find a way to say 'NS also creates delegation, but it is not 
labeled as Delegation Type because ...' but I'm coming up blank. Perhaps it's 
just in my head, but I wanted to check.

The original term was “Authoritative Delegation Type” which makes it explicitly 
distinctive from delegation point NS records. I can precede all the occurrences 
of Delegation Type with “Authoritative” if that makes folk happy.

Really up to the WG, I'm indecisive on this myself.

--
Petr Špaček

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to