This draft was already discussed and rejected.  I note that the draft 04 
has been deleted from the IETF site. 

Instead of addressing any of the many previous issues addressed against
the 04 draft, as demonstrated by reviewing the archives of that
discussion, it simply rehashes the same wrong claims made by the 04 draft.

Indeed, it was pointed out that it does not accurately state ARIN's policy
on the subject. This was just one of _many_ problems, but probably the
easiest to fix.  It is practically an insult to resubmit this draft in its
present form.

So, why is it coming up again?  

Can we finally kill this once and for all?

                --Dean

***In fact, according to Leslie Nobile, ARIN is considering dropping
in-addr support in the future, and has gone so far as to engage its
attorney's to research the question of whether it is obligated to provide
the service. Their lawyers say they are not obligated.





.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

Reply via email to