Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I preaching to the choir, or do people disagree with me?
Some do, count me in. > whether in-addr is required. In-addr is not required, nor will this draft > (despite its misleading name) change that. It should also not be allowed Please look into the document, the title was changed whereas the filename and the announcement text continued to say "require". In the document there are still some "requirements" - and, btw, non-ASCII characters - that I feel should be ``diplomatized'', but I fully support the general direction of that document. -Peter . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
