On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:18:08PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 10:21 -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looking for a bit of advice...
> >
> > On 1 June 2006, the RIRs are going to stop providing support for
> > ip6.int.
> >
> > Is there any reason anyone can think of that says we shouldn't remove
> > ip6 from the int zone?
>
> Only one, which is the same as RFC1918: misconfigured (they are not
> updated) implementations will try to query for it. Thus it might be an
> idea to point ip6.int to the AS112 boxes.
since it is not a configuration option, i'm not sure
this is an accuate statement... however the results
are the same. There is no good reason to dump yet more
traffic onto the unsuspecting auth servers.
> On the other side, the query rate is so low that configuring it on AS112
> is more of an overhead and annoyance than getting the queries in the
> first place.
>
> IMHO you can safely remove ip6.int from DNS.
and IMHO, no is not the time. There is no harm in leaving the
delegations in place.
>
> Greets,
> Jeroen
>
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
