On 23-Jun-2006, at 18:41, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
This note has very limited application to the AS112 project, but
since you
asked it here I am happy to give you the courtesy of a response.
If you want to put it in the draft, and you want DNSOP to consider
the draft,
then its relevant.
Not really. The reference is an active document, and its content is
relevant to this draft. If the draft referred to dies, then replacing
it with a different reference might well make sense. However, while
the draft referred to is alive, and the most appropriate reference, I
don't see any reason to make a change.
If this were a working group document, then this matter would be a
matter of consensus. Since it's an individual submission, I believe
it's up to us as authors, and any differences of opinion you might
have with us should properly be brought up if the documents are ever
last-called.
It's difficult to characterise your objection as anything other than
an oblique reaction to the anycast draft, however, of which your
dislike is profoundly on-record. Is there really new ground to cover,
here?
Unless anybody else here has a profound desire to see this circular
thread continue, I think I will stop at this point.
Joe
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
