Dean, > I think you are, or ought to be, being on the GROW WG, and author of the draft > appealed, since this was discussed on the GROW WG, and is documented on the > IESG > Appeals page.
the discussion of matters of the GROW WG is out of the scope of dnsop and thus out of scope for this mailing list. > I have not made any criticism of the "secret" -04 draft. However, since the > notion of stateful anycast is itself a fraud, it seems impossible that you can > fix the GROW draft. I look forward to seeing the -04 draft, however, and > whatever new complaints arise from it. [...] > I strongly disagree. The GROW document doesn't explain any current practice > whatsoever. Its entirely based on fraudulent claims and fictions. The tone expressed here (``fraud'') as well as in the earlier message <http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/msg03719.html>, is inacceptable. The RFC 3683 PR ACTION as documented in <http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg01967.html> enables maintainers of other IETF mailing lists, including this list, to remove your posting rights. Please consider this the final warning. You are asked to return to a civilized mode of discussion and to not discuss out of scope issues. The WG chairs will remove your posting rights upon your next failure to follow this request. This message is not subject to discussion or negotiation on this list. -Peter Koch DNSOP co-chair . dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
