> 
> On 8Aug 2006, at 3:05 PM, Peter Koch wrote:
> 
> > Dear WG,
> >
> > this initiates a Working Group Last Call for
> >
> >     draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-00.txt
> >
> > to end Thursday, 2006-08-24 23:59:59 UTC
> >
> 
> The last call appeared during my vacation, apologies for the later  
> reply.
> 
> Bottom line: I think this is important work and support it to  
> eventually be published as BCP. But....
> 
> 
> The text needs a bit more attention.
> 
> I had the benefit of reading the thread so I was not so surprised  
> that I had to read section 3 a couple of times and still didn't get  
> it. So, I think that the suggestions by Peter are actually needed to  
> improve readability and to make this document useful for the regular  
> admin. I am not sure if that is sufficient.
> 
> 
> Wouldn't it be a sensible suggestion to enter the e-mail address of  
> the 'local' adminsitrator for the MMAIL field?

        You want the default to be something that doesn't require
        any configuration.  Local overrides are fine.
 
> As for Ed's question:
> > Chapter 4 needs FQDN's in it.  Also, why the IANA registry  
> > reference? I don't see that IANA needs to have a list of these  
> > "should be split-view'ed" zones.
> 
> This is because you want to be able to point to a central place where  
> the list of names is maintained for which queries SHOULD NOT get out  
> on the internet. Besides you want to carefully control what gets on  
> that list. Hence an IANA registry, including the highest possible  
> review bar to get data in that registry. Or am I not listening  
> carefully and missing Ed's point?
> 
>
> Just a question. How is this going to be 'evenginerized'. Just  
> creating a BCP is not sufficient. This is something that can be part  
> of example configs in nameserver code but then the question is how to  
> turn it on and get the appropriate parameters. In other words who is  
> going to do the marketing after the IETF is done with it?

        BIND 9.4.0 already has all but for the RFC 1918 addresses
        in it.  The RFC 1918 prefixes are #ifdef out waiting for
        this to go to BCP.  Unfortunately changes to the status quo
        sometime need a BCP as this sort of change will require
        many to change their configurations.
 
> --Olaf
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Olaf M. Kolkman
> NLnet Labs
> http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
> 
> .
> dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
> web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
> mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
--
ISC Training!  October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DHCP.  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

Reply via email to