> > Local administrators clearly don't do this at the moment
> > despite being required to do so for the last 10 years
>
> really? i've not seen that.
RFC 1918
Indirect references to such addresses should be contained within the
enterprise. Prominent examples of such references are DNS Resource
Records and other information referring to internal private
addresses. In particular, Internet service providers should take
measures to prevent such leakage.
This covers the reverse prefixes for these address ranges.
> > for RFC 1918 addresses. The RFC 1918 prefixes would
> > not have been delegated to sacrifical servers if local
> > administrators were doing the right thing.
>
> that is not particularly true, since i was the one
> who proposed the creation of the sacrifical servers in
> the first place.
You mean to say that it wasn't prompted by leaked reverse
queries for these ranges?
--
ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html
