Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
mcr> It's not a question of: "can we do this", but rather a question of: if
mcr> we do it, then it needs to be done correctly, which means some test
mcr> cases and test data, and this takes a non-zero amount of time.
mcr>
mcr> Could the effort be better spent elsewhere?
> Additionally with DLV we also need to be able to validate which means
> more than upgrading OpenSSL. It also means getting the ruby libraries
> upgraded etc.
Yes, I was trying to leave the underlying technical hurdles aside
(because, I'm sure, when given the mandate, I can deal with them in short
order) and focus on the political and testability hurdles and intentions for
this list..
Given that DLV will be sunset'ed, are new algorithms important to this
community?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
