Hi Daniel,

Thank you. I would suggest to make that very relevant comment to the article in 
The Register. That would at least show that the writer aren't completely aware 
of all facts.

Anne-Marie


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Daniel Stirnimann [mailto:[email protected]] 
Skickat: den 18 mars 2015 17:00
Till: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder; David Conrad; 
<[email protected]>
Ämne: Re: [Dnssec-deployment] Clickbait: "Is the DNS' security protocol a waste 
of everyone's time and money?"

* PGP Signed by an unverified key: 2015-03-18 at 16:59:47

Hello Anne-Marie

> Anyway. I have asked for a correction in the article. The 2009 outage 
> of .SE had nothing to do with dnssec, but with a missing trailing dot. 
> That is fixed now.

The TLD DNSSEC outage listed for .ch (January 2012) at 
http://ianix.com/pub/dnssec-outages.html did not exist either. I had discussed 
that with people from DNSViz some time ago, as I was not aware of any issue 
during that time.

I remember a DNS-OARC meeting when this URL popped up during a discussion. It's 
kind of a problem if people refer to this URL as a proof for DNSSEC failures 
when a lot of them did not happen i.e. were application/network problems at 
DNSviz or even DNSSEC unrelated.

Daniel

--
SWITCH
Daniel Stirnimann, SWITCH-CERT
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland phone +41 44 268 15 15, 
direct +41 44 268 16 24 [email protected], http://www.switch.ch

* Daniel Stirnimann <[email protected]>
* 0x82C510A4 - Unverified(L)

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to