If I was a real conspiracy theorist I would be tempted to argue that
Snowden is a mole sent by the CIA and the Brits to erode trust in crypto
and seed general paranoia so they can sniff traffic more easily.

:-)

On 3/18/15 1:51 PM, Richard Lamb wrote:
> Yeah - we need proofs.   This is all old news.  But I suppose everyone must 
> air their concerns.  I remember all the DEFCON/Moxie talks on this from a few 
> years ago.  I think the key thing here is choice.  -Rick
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:33 AM
> To: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder; Daniel Stirnimann; David Conrad; 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Dnssec-deployment] Clickbait: "Is the DNS' security protocol a 
> waste of everyone's time and money?"
> 
> What annoys me the most is the spreading of FUD about weak crypto mechanisms 
> and that the key management are controlled by the government, without backing 
> up with any facts or proofs. 
> 
> Anne-Marie
> 
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] För Anne-Marie 
> Eklund-Löwinder
> Skickat: den 18 mars 2015 17:05
> Till: Daniel Stirnimann; David Conrad; 
> <[email protected]>
> Ämne: Re: [Dnssec-deployment] Clickbait: "Is the DNS' security protocol a 
> waste of everyone's time and money?"
> 
> * PGP Signed: 2015-03-18 at 17:04:39
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Thank you. I would suggest to make that very relevant comment to the article 
> in The Register. That would at least show that the writer aren't completely 
> aware of all facts.
> 
> Anne-Marie
> 
> 
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Daniel Stirnimann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Skickat: den 18 mars 2015 17:00
> Till: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder; David Conrad; 
> <[email protected]>
> Ämne: Re: [Dnssec-deployment] Clickbait: "Is the DNS' security protocol a 
> waste of everyone's time and money?"
> 
>> Old Signed by an unverified key: 2015-03-18 at 16:59:47
> 
> Hello Anne-Marie
> 
>> Anyway. I have asked for a correction in the article. The 2009 outage 
>> of .SE had nothing to do with dnssec, but with a missing trailing dot.
>> That is fixed now.
> 
> The TLD DNSSEC outage listed for .ch (January 2012) at 
> http://ianix.com/pub/dnssec-outages.html did not exist either. I had 
> discussed that with people from DNSViz some time ago, as I was not aware of 
> any issue during that time.
> 
> I remember a DNS-OARC meeting when this URL popped up during a discussion. 
> It's kind of a problem if people refer to this URL as a proof for DNSSEC 
> failures when a lot of them did not happen i.e. were application/network 
> problems at DNSviz or even DNSSEC unrelated.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> --
> SWITCH
> Daniel Stirnimann, SWITCH-CERT
> Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland phone +41 44 268 15 15, 
> direct +41 44 268 16 24 [email protected], http://www.switch.ch
> 
> * Daniel Stirnimann <[email protected]>
> * 0x82C510A4 - Unverified(L)
> 
> * Anne-Marie Eklund-Lowinder <[email protected]>
> * 0x42B1CF94
> 

Reply via email to