> Norman Walsh wrote: >> >> Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched >> the element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed >> to happen.) >> >> I'll take a look. Oh, I completely forgot to report this since I fixed it in the stylesheet we're using, but <authorblurb> doesn't seem to have made it into XSL 1.29 either. /claus ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Eric Richardson
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Eric Richardson
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Eric Richardson
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Claus Rasmussen
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Rune Enggaard Jensen
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Matthew Harrison
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Jirka Kosek
