Norm wrote:
> Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched the
> element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed to
> happen.)
>
> I'll take a look.
Now you are at it, could you please look at <productnumber>? They are also
red in the PDF files I have tried to produce.
Best regards
Rune Enggaard
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Eric Richardson
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Eric Richardson
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Eric Richardson
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Claus Rasmussen
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Rune Enggaard Jensen
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Matthew Harrison
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Norman Walsh
- Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO? Jirka Kosek
