Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: FOP: boomarks don't work well

[Tobias Reif]

Jens

> I would be happy to donate it to Norms styleshhets. However, they do
> not really fit in, since norm manipulates a DocBook tree, and I
> manipulates the resulting FO tree.

Perhaps the same output could be generated by incorporating thir effect in some way.

> I have not tested it yet, bt the FOP 0.25 might have fixed this issue
> ??

I couldn't get the rc to run.

> Norm doesn't really have a NW-DBK2FO-XSLT project, but rather a
> DocBook XSL stylesheet projekt :)

But when I call them by their name, "DocBook XSL Stylesheets" [1], then no one can know what I'm talking about; there are many DocBook XSL Stylesheets or DocBook XSL Stylesheet projects. Also, the name on the site and the name you recommend to use does not specify which format the transformation targets. So do clearly communicate which XSLTs I mean, I say things like "NW-DBK2FO-XSLTs"; on a DocBook list "NW-FO-XSLTs" or "Norm's FO XSLTs" (which means the same) would suffice. When talking about other DocBook XSLTs, I say "my DocBook to XHTML XSLTs" or "Foo's FO XSLTs". Talking about "the DocBook XSL Stylesheets" as you suggest only brings a lot of confusion in many cases as I have seen; the name is too generic IMHO.
I'm open to any other suggestions though :)

Tobi

[1]
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/projects/xsl/

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/