Ron Catterall wrote:
1. Is Oxygen corrupting the pure XML distinction between structure and
presentation by introducing 'bold' and 'italic' into XML when what they
should be doing is offering different ways of emphasizing text. The
Oxygen solution is no different to what I do when I use <emphasis
role="bold"> and define how to present 'bold' in my customization
layer. Unfortunately 'bold' and 'italic' are emotive terms which carry
presentation meaning - but doesn't <para> also do this as well, we all
know roughly what a paragraph looks like. Anyway, if you use Oxygen 9
you don't have to switch to author view if you prefer typing tags.
Paragraphs, I think, are more structural. You can still mark up
paragraphs in languages such as traditional Chinese that don't present
them in quite the same way. (I may have to defer to an actual Chinese
speaker for details on that though.) You can also indicate paragraphs in
spoken, non-printed text.
We do have standard means of indicating paragraphs, but even within
English they're not consistent. Sometimes there's extra space between
paragraphs. Sometimes there isn't. Sometimes the first line is indented.
Sometimes it isn't.
So I do think paragraphs are more structural than presentational.
The problem with bold and italic is not that they have semantic meaning.
It's that they have several. Emphasis is not the same thing as a foreign
term or a mathematical equation. Merely marking words as emphasized
does not capture sufficient meaning to enable high quality typesetting.
We can do better.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
