On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:39:03 +0300, Bob Stayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since your table sets explicit widths for all columns, the template
named "table.width" should have computed the table's width and set the
width of the block container to that. However, there was a bug in that
computation, which I have now fixed in source (so the next snapshot
should work). In the meantime, you can add a dbfo table-width
processing instruction to that table to provide the correct width info,
which would be the sum of the explicit column widths.
Both the processing instruction and the svn trunk version seem to work
fine. I did not try the snapshot as currently the latest one is dated
23-May-2008 09:21 - I guess these are not generated at check in, but as
batch jobs at certain time.
Thanks a lot for your help!
::Antti::
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
