Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:22:47 +0100:
> HTML I believe it's a browser feature? > So is it reasonable to simply pass the mathml through to the html? Yes, and absolutely yes. > Agreed there are no standards (yet). W3C seem very slow to get to > grips with multi-namespaced documents. True, but recommendations and best practices have been around for many years; see e.g. http://www.w3.org/Math/XSL/Overview.html and http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/. Note that if you are willing to force Mozilla-based browsers upon your users, then you don't need to jump through any of the hoops set up in .../Overview.html; you simply include namespaced, inline MathML as outlined in the cited TR, which is what the DocBook XHTML stylesheets have been doing for a long time. MathML has been supported natively since Firefox 1, and in a very non-techie-user-friendly way since Firefox 3. Justus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
