[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:22:47
+0100:
HTML I believe it's a browser feature?
So is it reasonable to simply pass the mathml through to the html?
Yes, and absolutely yes.
Agreed there are no standards (yet). W3C seem very slow to get to
grips with multi-namespaced documents.
True, but recommendations and best practices have been around for many
years; see e.g. http://www.w3.org/Math/XSL/Overview.html and
http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/.
I'll collate the options from this thread to the FAQ;
What I'd like to hear is what users think of the various mathml options.
How complete they are, what problems you met, general impressions.
If we can get a consensus that tool X and process Y works we
can add it to the docbook documentation and / or the faq.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
