No, that's not what I meant. All I'm saying is that people will want to migrate legacy content to DB 5 to take advantage of new features, so I argue against questioning each and every construct of the existing docbook-slides, and in favor of extending it, while being very careful and constructive with backward-incompatible changes.
Of course, if there are good reasons to make backward-incompatible changes, may they be done. This *is* how DB 5 came about. Justus DavePawson <[email protected]> wrote on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:30:15 +0000: > So you'd like slides to remain static from now on, despite others > wanting more from it? Just to keep your usage unchanged? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
