Hi all, this is only one reason more, why we use only dblatex for PDF-output. FOP seems us far away from the possibilities of pdflatex which is used by dblatex.
Robert -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ben.guillon [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2010 15:05 An: Peter Desjardins; [email protected] Betreff: Re: [docbook-apps] Creating a documentation set with separate book outputs Hi, dblatex does that on <set>s: it builds a PDF per book, with it's own TOC, index, in each. Cross-linking between books work too. Regards, BG On Tue, 11 May 2010 16:20:39 +0200, Peter Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have a large book that I would like to split up into several smaller, >> interlinked books. The plan is to create separate book elements for the >> separate books, but include a global TOC and index in each. I thought >> that >> docbook sets were the way to do this, but it seems that sets are used to >> merge separate books into a single one. I've tried googling, but to no >> avail. >> >> Is there a way to do it? >> >> Thanks and Regards, --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
