On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:44:13 +0200 [email protected] wrote: > > The wrapper is atom, not docbook, which I publish directly. > > ure. A standard. Fine. Isn't that OPML-related? Rings a bell somehow.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt > > But usually (I thought at least) the wrapper (i.e. the feed) does not > contain the entire articles, but it only refers to the content. > > But at least some feed providers restrict it to that, as far as I can > say. Not in my experience. > But maybe I got something fundamentally wrong. Go find some rss or atom feeds and have a look at the structure. > > > From the above, you can see that the html header from docbook is all > > redundant? > > Not from the above, > but if I want to keep the article separate, then yes. I'm unsure what an atom feed reader would do with a link to docbook source in the body. Try it? > Separate articles, each written in DocBook, atom being the wrapper > pointing to articles living for themselves, one by one. Hand craft a feed and see what bloglines or something does with it before you go further. HTH -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
