>>>>> Dave Pawson writes: >> > From the above, you can see that the html header from docbook is all >> > redundant? >> >> Not from the above, >> but if I want to keep the article separate, then yes.
> I'm unsure what an atom feed reader would do with a link to docbook > source in the body. Try it? Hmm, Dave, *come* *on*!! Pls! I mean, of course the link points to HTML content, not to literal DocBook content. Have a look at this feed e.g.: http://pragprog.com/feed/global Minimal content for each atom feed entry (or is it RSS?!?), just a pointer to the content, which is separate. By now I am also aware of "Norm's Own Approach", pointed to by Maurith, see below! I assume, that's DocBook articles with the feed refering to the HTML content generated from DocBook. Whether it really is like that with Norm's Own Approach or not, I would like it like that, and that's where I would like to get. >> Separate articles, each written in DocBook, atom being the wrapper >> pointing to articles living for themselves, one by one. > Hand craft a feed and see what bloglines or something does with it > before you go further. > HTH > regards > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk Thanks for your patience and for your offer as well! J. >>>>> "MJ" == Mauritz Jeanson <[email protected]> writes: MJ> Norman Walsh writes his blog in (a customization of) DocBook: MJ> http://norman.walsh.name/ MJ> Here is an old (obsolete?) article describing the machinery: MJ> http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/14/how MJ> Mauritz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
