I wonder if anyone is using b and i in selectors in CSS? Such selectors would have to
be enhanced to include the new element names.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Fahlgren" <[email protected]>
To: "DocBook Apps ML" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:02 PM
Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: Including <b> and <i> in XHTML stylesheets
Leaving aside the issue of the highlighting stylesheets, here are the
uses of <i> in the html/ stylesheets:
biblio-iso690.xsl:3
biblio.xsl:3
component.xsl:1
division.xsl:1
synop.xsl:1
xref.xsl:1
simlarly, <b>:
autotoc.xsl:2
block.xsl:10
ebnf.xsl:1
formal.xsl:1
lists.xsl:1
qandaset.xsl:3
refentry.xsl:1
titlepage.xsl:2
Looking at every single instance above, I don't see a single one that
should remain a <b> or <i> instead of being either removed or changed
to <strong> or <em>. Does anyone want to argue why <b> and <i> should
be preserved for 1.76.1?
Thanks,
Keith
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
