Keith Fahlgren wrote: > Looking at every single instance above, I don't see a single one that > should remain a <b> or <i> instead of being either removed or changed > to <strong> or <em>. Does anyone want to argue why <b> and <i> should > be preserved for 1.76.1?
Maybe I have missed some previous discussion, but what's the reason for changing <b>/<i> into <strong>/<em>? Also please note that HTML5 is not so antagonistic about <b> and <i> as HTML4: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html#the-i-element Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: [email protected] http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
