David Cramer wrote: > I've done a little research on this and found on the fop list some > discussion (pasted below). The fop developers feel that using the > hyphenation character to achieve this is an abuse of the > hypenation-character property.
I don't think so. Are FOP developers aware of the fact that DocBook
stylesheets insert soft-hyphen (U+00AD) character at all places of
possible break? This characters marks possible places for hyphenation.
> However, it is to my mind an obvious and
> important thing to want to do, so I would say that it's an omission from
> the FO-spec.
Of course U+00AD is defined in Unicode and not in XSL-FO.
> I've meant to post on the fop list asking for an extension
> feature of some kind to allow for this situation without abusing any
> features, but haven't gotten around to it.
It would be nice to ask FOP developers why they think it is abuse. I
don't see any evidence for this neither in Unicode nor in XSL-FO spec. I
think that this probably lives in area where exact behaviour is
implementation dependent. So obvious thing to do is to follow useful
behavior of market leaders (XEP, XSL Formatter).
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: [email protected] http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
