On 23 Sep 2011, at 17:47, Keith Fahlgren wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:30 PM, davep <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since the toc is never needed (the ncx supplants a toc), would it make sense >> to delete the call to generate it such that annoyance is removed? > > > Many publishers deliberately include an HTML TOC in their EPUB > documents. An HTML TOC can offer more nuanced layout and text than an > NCX TOC and is appropriate for some titles.
It sounds like it *can* be useful in some cases, but maybe shouldn't be the default. Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
