On 09/24/2011 08:34 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 23 Sep 2011, at 17:47, Keith Fahlgren wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:30 PM, davep<[email protected]> wrote:
Since the toc is never needed (the ncx supplants a toc), would it make sense
to delete the call to generate it such that annoyance is removed?
Many publishers deliberately include an HTML TOC in their EPUB
documents. An HTML TOC can offer more nuanced layout and text than an
NCX TOC and is appropriate for some titles.
It sounds like it *can* be useful in some cases, but maybe shouldn't be the
default.
Chris
I'm 50:50, could argue either way?
How messy is it, in, say 3 different readers, to have the duplicate ToC?
Perhaps use that as the decider?
regards
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
