Hi, Here is the link to the part of Bob’s book that covers the Saxon processor:
http://sagehill.net/docbookxsl/InstallingAProcessor.html#InstallSaxon I think you can keep the xmllint processing as is (I use it for XInclude processing, too), and just swap in saxon for xsltproc, using Bob’s instructions. I don’t bother swapping in Xerces (I don’t use any of the features that go beyond what Saxon supports). Best regards, Dick ------- XML Press XML for Technical Communicators http://xmlpress.net [email protected] > On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:26, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > I was going by this reference as to requirements, and have not read the whole > book (thus I did not yet see the Java requirement): > http://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.1/programlisting.html > > Admittedly I'm trying to do something quicker than I should and not reading > everything (I've been through a lot of material, but it's just a drop in the > bucket for everything needed when I really just need to sit down and write > content). I've had some frustrations getting the Java-based processors > working and have tried to stick to the xmllint/jing/xsltproc family for that > single reason. The Java-based processing answer likely also answers my > earlier syntax highlighting question about whether to abandon my current > approach with xmllint. > > To use Saxon or Xalan I would have to change the current build scheme, which > I've never succeeded at: > xmllint --output "${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml" --nonet --noent -xinclude > "${CONTENT}/${TITLE}.xml" > xsltproc --output ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo ${XSLT}/docbook.xsl > ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.xml > fop -c ${PREFIX}/fop.xconf -fo ${OBJ}/${TITLE}_monolithic.fo -pdf > ${OUT}/${TITLE}.pdf > > I realize I'm probably asking a lot, but is there any advice I can get on > editing that chain of commands to instead work with Saxon or Xalan? Getting > past the tools on the command line (for a hand written Makefile) is just > getting frustrating and is why the current chain of commands have never > evolved to anything Java-based. > > I do plan on reading more (I'm not resisting reading), but there are other > requirements which tend to require at least a draft to be available sooner > rather than later. > > Thanks! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bob Stayton <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], Docbook <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:09:00 -0000 (UTC) > Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] <programlisting linenumbering="numbered"> does > not number... > Hi, > Did you read this section in my online book about line numbering? It > only works with Java-based processors. > Bob Stayton > Sagehill Enterprises > [email protected] > On 2/10/2017 11:01 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Under DocBook 5.1 I've been able to list programs, but line numbering > > has no effect (and there is no error under xmllint or jing). Is there > > some ENTITY or other precondition required for line numbering under 5.1? > > > > Thanks! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
