At 10:24 AM +0000 6/5/02, Matt G. wrote:
>>1. Is "packagename" the right name for symmetry with classname and >>interfacename or should this be simply "package"? Or perhapps >>"oopackage" for symmetry with ooclass and oointerface? > >Personally, I fail to see why 'package' wouldn't work just as well. >Unless 'package' is desired as a structural element, there would be >no meaningful distinction between using 'package' and 'packagename', >for an inline element. > > To me, a "package" is something that contains classes, whereas the proposed "packagename" element would only contain PCDATA. But this is a minor issue, so either way works for me. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
