I'd like to second that point. Compare <oointerface> v. <interface>. Consistency seems to require <oopackage>.
David > To add another dimension to the discussion, the word > "package" in the field of software can also mean > a package of software for distribution, such as an > RPM package. Authors who deal with packaging software > but not APIs will perhaps misuse a <package> element. > The advantage of the oo* names is that they are > specific to their subfield.
