Cedric,

would it be possible to have you post your comments to the official OASIS comment list?

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=docbook

I want to make sure we are following proper OASIS procedures.

Thanks and best regards,

--Scott
Chair, DocBook Publishers subcommittee

Mimil Mimil wrote:
Hello,

I just have a little comment on 8.Publishing Subcommittee report ... Scott suggests everyone read it and provide comments.

With an external view (no knowledge of publishing) I wondered what is the real motivation to have 3 distinct elements (dialogue, drama, poetry) because they seem to have the same goal "speeches" and also have the same xml definition in the spec (http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/specs/publishers-1.0-spec-cd-01.pdf) If the definition is the same, isn't the role attribute sufficient within a single dialogue element? Or is it a choice made to simplify the stylesheet work as these elements really need a different printing layout?

Best regards,
Cédric,

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Bob Stayton <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 15 July 2009
    =============================================================

    The DocBook Technical Committee met on Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at
    01:00p EDT (10:00a PDT, 17:00GMT, 18:00BST, 19:00CEST, 02:00JST+,
    022:30p India+) for 85 minutes.

    1. Roll call

    Present: Paul Grosso, Gershon Joseph, Scott Hudson, Dick
    Hamilton, Nancy Harrison, Larry Rowland, Bob Stayton,
    Norm Walsh.

    Absent: Jim Earley, Keith Falhgren, Patricia Gee, Jirka Kosek, Corey
    Leong, Dave Pawson, John Pederson, Pine Zhang

    2. Accepted the minutes [1] of the previous meeting.

    3. Next meeting: 19 August 2009

    No regrets so far.

    4. Review of the agenda.

    Add new RFE 2820947 "Ability to transclude text" as 9b.

    5. Review of open action items

     a. Bob to organize TDG reading after names are fixed.
     REMOVE (see agenda item 7)

     b. Jirka to add schema comparison table to DocBook 5.0 Transition
    Guide.
     COMPLETED

     c. Norm to work with Mary to make Publishing Subcommittee
       schema a Committee Working Draft.
     COMPLETED

     d. Norm to work with Keith and Scott to update the OASIS committee
       site to make the Publishing Subcommittee Working Draft
       publicly available.
     CONTINUE

     e. Norm to put the new backwards compatibility policy in the spec.
     CONTINUE

     f. Norm to put the new backwards compatibility policy in the
       reference documentation.
     CONTINUE

     g. Norm will update 5.1 with changes to initializer
       content model.
     COMPLETED

     h. Norm to take a look at the inlines and make a proposal
       regarding RFE 2791288.
     CONTINUE

    6.  DocBook 5.0 standards update.

    Norm is working with Mary to submit DocBook 5.0 as an
    OASIS Standard.  It should be ready to go by the
    end of this week.

    7.  New edition of DocBook: The Definitive Guide
    Dick and Norm announced that O'Reilly will be publishing
    a new edition of DocBook: The Definitive Guide.
    Norm suggests that the committee review the
    reference pages when they are ready.  He hopes to
    have them ready by 1 September.

    8.  Publishing Subcommittee report.

    "The DocBook Publishers Schema Version 1.0" Committee Draft
    specification [2] is available for review.  The review
    period will end 31 August.  Scott suggests everyone read
    it and provide comments.

    9. Using a map for modular DocBook.

    Discussion of Larry's second sample of DocBook assembly.

    Norm raised concerns about the renderas attribute as well
    as importing foreign content such as DITA or other schemas.
    That implies some transformation process, and will the
    committee specify that?

    Gershon: DITA uses specializations of topicref
    in the bookmap schema to indicate how a topic is to be
    represented. He also pointed out that in DITA maps,
    topicref can only refer to a topic element.
    In DocBook assembly, any DocBook element can be included, and the
    renderas attribute allows the
    author to indicate how it would be represented.

    Larry: for foreign content, perhaps have a section in
    the assembly that identifies a stylesheet to be used
    for transforming content during the assembly.

    Bob: we should separate including DocBook content (easy)
    from including foreign content (harder).

    Norm: transformations are defined by the implementation.
    We may provide some reference implementations.

    Larry: assembling a help system requires different
    processing from assembling a book.

    Norm: put an "outputtype" attribute on the structure element
    as a whole to indicate how it should be processed overall,
    and use renderas at the element level to map one element
    to another.

    Bob: One assembly mode is to map all referenced elements
    into a valid DocBook book, so nested topics would
    become sections, for example.  Another assembly mode
    creates a structured TOC and processes each reference
    separately (similar to the DocBook Website customization),
without assembling it into a book first. Larry: may use an attribute on elements to indicate
    chunking level.

    ACTION: Larry to create a new assembly example for next meeting.

    9b.  RFE 2820947 "Ability to transclude text".

    First we discussed conref since the requestor mentioned it.
    Gershon and Paul described problems with implementing
    conref, including hard coding references. Gershon suggested
    that DITA's keyref, which uses a level of indirection,
    would be more flexible.  A note from Eliot Kimber
    didn't reach the list in time, so it will be reviewed
    for the next meeting.

    Paul: use existing standards such as XInclude with xpointer.
    Creating new schemes is a whole big thing.

    Bob: the xpointer scheme is not a standard, so there is no way
    to include all the children of an element without including
    the element itself.  That can help with the problem of duplicate
    ids when importing the same content more than once.

    Paul: If the children that are imported have IDs, then
    the duplicate ID problem remains.

    Norm: perhaps we could define some small subset of
    xpointer scheme.

    We will continue this item next month, referring to it
    as "transclusion" rather than "conref".


    10. Add topic element (RFE #2820190).

    Bob described his proposal for a new topic element.
    Norm said the need for a specific element for
    standalone topics still exists, and this proposal meets the need.
     Larry thought allowing some
    elements to serve as containers of a sequence of
    topics was a good idea.
    ACTION: Norm to create a DocBook 5 customization layer
    with topic, so we can experiment.

    ACTION: Bob to present the proposal to the docbook
    mailing list when Norm has the customization done.


    11.  Review of Requests for Enhancement

      To browse a specific RFE, enter the URL (on one line):

        http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&;
    <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&;>;
        group_id=21935&atid=384107&aid=XXXX

      RFEs to revisit for 6.0
1907003 biblioid content model too broad RFEs to be considered 1679665 Add better support for modular documentation Discussed as item 9.

2770858 Add limited emphasis to ubiquitous inlines 2791288 add quote to corpauthor and gui elements
    Awaiting Norm's action item.

2820190 add a topic element Discussed as item 10.

    Meeting adjourned at 2:25pm EDT.
    -----

    [1]
    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-tc/200905/msg00009.html
    [2]
    http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/specs/publishers-1.0-spec-cd-01.pdf

    Bob Stayton
    Sagehill Enterprises
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to