Robert P. J. Day wrote: > perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the > definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD. > however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas > can represent things non-representable in simple DTDs, will there be > a point where docbook (5.0?) can no longer be represented by a simple > DTD? or has that already happened?
Please see the following comparison: http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#introduction-schemas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: [email protected] http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
