On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the
> > definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD.
> > however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas
> > can represent things non-representable in simple DTDs, will there be
> > a point where docbook (5.0?) can no longer be represented by a simple
> > DTD? or has that already happened?
>
> Please see the following comparison:
>
> http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#introduction-schemas
thanks, that's exactly what i was after.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
